Ból biodra u dorosłych
Rokowania, prognozy i postęp choroby

Ból biodra, występujący zarówno u osób starszych, jak i młodych dorosłych, jest istotnym problemem klinicznym prowadzącym do ograniczeń funkcjonalnych i obniżenia jakości życia. Przewlekły ból może progresować do martwicy jałowej kości lub choroby zwyrodnieniowej stawów (ChZS), a po 3 latach u około 15% pacjentów obserwuje się progresję choroby, a 12% wymaga całkowitej wymiany stawu biodrowego (THR). Po 6 latach odsetek ten wzrasta odpowiednio do 28% i 22%. Czynniki prognostyczne pogorszenia stanu obejmują m.in. wiek ≥ 60 lat (w ChZS), dłuższy niż 6 miesięcy czas trwania bólu (OR 1,87-2,03), stopień zmian radiologicznych Kellgrena-Lawrence’a ≥ 2, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m², obecność konfliktu udowo-panewkowego (OR 3,47), dysplazji panewki (OR 2,75) oraz uszkodzenia obrąbka panewkowego (OR 10,71). Warto podkreślić, że u pacjentów z przedartrytycznym bólem biodra progresja do zabiegu chirurgicznego jest mniej powszechna, co wskazuje na potencjalną skuteczność leczenia zachowawczego u wybranych chorych.

Ból biodra u dorosłych – rokowanie (prognoza wyniku)

Ból biodra jest powszechnym problemem, który może dotykać nie tylko osoby starsze, ale również młodych i aktywnych dorosłych w średnim wieku. Przewlekły ból stawu biodrowego prowadzi do ograniczeń w chodzeniu, siadaniu i staniu, co wpływa na zdolność do pracy lub wykonywania codziennych czynności. Bez odpowiedniego leczenia, czynniki przyczyniające się do bólu mogą postępować, prowadząc do martwicy jałowej kości lub choroby zwyrodnieniowej stawów (ChZS), która jest główną przyczyną obniżonej jakości życia i utraty funkcji u osób starszych.1

Naturalny przebieg bólu biodra

Naturalny przebieg bólu i funkcjonowania fizycznego u pacjentów z bólem biodra jest wysoce indywidualny i zmienny – niektórzy pacjenci pozostają stabilni, podczas gdy inni ulegają poprawie lub stopniowemu pogorszeniu.2 Badania wskazują, że wśród pacjentów zgłaszających się do lekarza pierwszego kontaktu z bólem biodra, po 3 latach choroba postępuje u około 15% pacjentów, a 12% otrzymuje całkowitą wymianę stawu biodrowego (Total Hip Replacement, THR). Po 6 latach choroba postępuje u 28% pacjentów, a 22% przechodzi zabieg THR.3

W przypadku pacjentów z przedartrytycznym bólem biodra (przed rozwinięciem pełnoobjawowej choroby zwyrodnieniowej stawów), badania pokazują, że prawie połowa nie postępuje do zabiegu chirurgicznego w okresie co najmniej jednego roku obserwacji. Na przykład w badaniu z udziałem młodszych pacjentów (średni wiek 25,4 lat), tylko 51,7% zdecydowało się na operację w trakcie minimum rocznej obserwacji.45

Czynniki prognostyczne pogorszenia stanu

Identyfikacja czynników prognostycznych jest istotna dla informowania pacjentów o prawdopodobnym przebiegu ich schorzenia oraz dostosowania leczenia do rokowania.6 Badania wykazały szereg czynników związanych z pogorszeniem stanu i potrzebą zabiegu operacyjnego:

Czynniki demograficzne i kliniczne
  • Wiek ≥ 60 lat (w przypadku ChZS)7, natomiast młodszy wiek jest predyktorem progresji do zabiegu chirurgicznego w przypadku przedartrytycznego bólu biodra (OR 0,95 na rok [0,93-0,98])8
  • Choroby współistniejące – wyższy wskaźnik chorób współistniejących wiąże się z pogorszeniem bólu biodra (silne dowody)910
  • Współistniejąca choroba zwyrodnieniowa stawu kolanowego zwiększa ryzyko pogorszenia bólu biodra (słabe dowody)11
  • Czas trwania bólu dłuższy niż 6 miesięcy zwiększa prawdopodobieństwo progresji do zabiegu chirurgicznego (OR 1,87-2,03)12
  • Stopień Kellgrena-Lawrence’a ≥ 2 w badaniu radiologicznym jest predyktorem THR1314
  • Migracja głowy kości udowej w kierunku górnym lub (górno)bocznym15
  • Stwardnienie podchrzęstne kości16
Objawy kliniczne
  • Sztywność poranna17
  • Ból w pachwinie lub przyśrodkowej części uda18
  • Zmniejszony zakres wyprostu/przywiedzenia stawu biodrowego19
  • Bolesna rotacja wewnętrzna20
  • Wskaźnik masy ciała (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m²21
  • Gorsza funkcja fizyczna (OR 0,96 na punkt w skali PROMIS [0,92-0,99])22
Rozpoznania kliniczne
  • Konflikt udowo-panewkowy (FAI) (OR 3,47 [2,05-5,89])2324
  • Dysplazja panewki (OR 2,75 [1,73-4,35])2526
  • Uszkodzenie obrąbka panewkowego potwierdzone w badaniach obrazowych (OR 10,71 [6,98-16,47])2728
Czynniki behawioralne i psychospołeczne
  • Brak nadzorowanych ćwiczeń i niższy poziom aktywności fizycznej (słabe dowody)29
  • Niższy poziom wykształcenia (słabe dowody)30
  • Niższa witalność jest predyktorem pogorszenia funkcjonowania fizycznego (silne dowody)31

Przewidywanie bólu po zabiegu całkowitej wymiany stawu biodrowego

Znaczący odsetek pacjentów z chorobą zwyrodnieniową stawów (ChZS) nadal doświadcza umiarkowanego do silnego bólu po całkowitej wymianie stawu (TJR). Interesujące jest to, że przedoperacyjne poziomy bólu nie są związane z pooperacyjnym bólem resztkowym.32

Badania wykazały, że powszechnie oceniane kliniczne i behawioralne pomiary przed operacją nie pozwalają wiarygodnie przewidzieć wyników bólowych po TJR. Analiza danych, szczególnie dla choroby zwyrodnieniowej stawu kolanowego, sugeruje, że ból pooperacyjny jest minimalnie związany z przedoperacyjnymi właściwościami bólu.33

Chociaż intensywność bólu przed operacją, dysproporcja między intensywnością bólu a uszkodzeniem stawu, objawy przypominające neuropatię, czynniki psychospołeczne, takie jak katastrofizacja bólu i słabe strategie radzenia sobie, są powszechnie wymieniane jako ważne czynniki predykcyjne, wyniki badań sugerują, że wyprowadzenie markerów prognostycznych dla przetrwania bólu po TJR będzie wymagało bardziej kompleksowego zrozumienia leżących u podstaw mechanizmów.34

Obiektywna ocena bólu biodra

Ból jest niepożądanym doświadczeniem sensorycznym, które może wywoływać depresję i ograniczać codzienne aktywności życiowe, co z kolei negatywnie wpływa na siłę roboczą. W najnowszych badaniach wykazano, że amplituda fal mózgowych znacząco różni się między pacjentami z bólem biodra a pacjentami bez bólu, a te różnice umożliwiają obiektywne określenie stopnia bólu przy użyciu uczenia maszynowego.35

Systemy monitorowania elektroencefalografii (EEG) mogą stanowić użyteczne, nieinwazyjne narzędzie do obiektywnej oceny bólu biodra podczas chodzenia. Takie podejście może być przydatne do charakteryzowania bólu pacjentów, takiego jak ból dolnej części pleców i ChZS, podczas codziennych czynności, do określenia, czy wskazana jest terapia operacyjna, lub do monitorowania efektów leczenia przeciwbólowego.36

Znaczenie wyników zgłaszanych przez pacjentów (PROs)

Wyniki zgłaszane przez pacjentów (Patient-Reported Outcomes, PROs) są niezbędne do dokładnego zbadania i porównania wpływu różnych metod leczenia na niepełnosprawność u osób z zaburzeniami biodra. PROs są często używane i zalecane do wspierania podejmowania decyzji klinicznych, polityki zdrowotnej i procesów refundacyjnych.37

PROs mogą dostarczyć indywidualnym lekarzom i środowisku ortopedycznemu danych, które w połączeniu z odpowiednimi pomiarami klinicznymi poprawiają zdolność stratyfikacji ryzyka pacjentów na tych, którzy prawdopodobnie poprawią się po operacji, i tych, którzy mniej prawdopodobnie skorzystają. Zbieranie PROs przed i po operacji może pomóc we wcześniejszym wykrywaniu potencjalnych powikłań, zmniejszyć chorobowość, zmniejszyć wskaźniki rewizji oraz poprawić jakość opieki, jaką otrzymują pacjenci.38

Badania pokazały, że stan funkcjonalny dużej kohorty pacjentów znacznie poprawił się po całkowitej wymianie stawu biodrowego i kolanowego, w oparciu o rutynowe zbieranie danych zgłaszanych przez pacjentów i danych klinicznych, co pomogło w przewidywaniu osób z gorszymi wynikami na wcześniejszych etapach.39

Podsumowanie rokowania w bólu biodra u dorosłych

Przewidywanie, którzy pacjenci z bólem biodra lub chorobą zwyrodnieniową stawu biodrowego mają większe prawdopodobieństwo progresji choroby, jest ważne dla pracowników służby zdrowia.40 Korzystając ze zmiennych uzyskanych z wywiadu, badania fizykalnego i wyników radiologicznych, możliwe jest lepsze zidentyfikowanie osób o wysokim ryzyku całkowitej wymiany stawu biodrowego.41

Próba leczenia zachowawczego jest prawdopodobnie warta rozważenia u większości pacjentów, biorąc pod uwagę, że u znacznego odsetka nie następuje progresja do zabiegu chirurgicznego.42 Korzyści z leczenia choroby zwyrodnieniowej stawu biodrowego obejmują złagodzenie bólu i poprawę funkcji, co skutkuje poprawą jakości życia.43

Całkowita wymiana stawu jest uważana za najbardziej skuteczną interwencję w przypadku ciężkiej choroby zwyrodnieniowej stawów, zmniejszającą ból i niepełnosprawność oraz przywracającą niektórym pacjentom prawie normalną funkcję.44 Jednak istotne jest dokładne monitorowanie bólu i funkcji stawu przez cały okres leczenia (zarówno klinicznie, jak i w formie samooceny), co jest nieocenione w optymalizacji leczenia i indywidualizacji opieki.45

Kolejne rozdziały

Zapraszamy do dalszego czytania naszego leksykonu.

Wybierz kolejny rozdział z menu poniżej, aby otworzyć nową podstronę kompedium wiedzy i uzyskać szczegółowe informację o leku, substancji lub chorobie.

  1. 10.04.2026
  2. www.leksykon.com.pl

Materiały źródłowe

  • #1 White Paper: Hip Care and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) – Heartbeat Medical
    https://heartbeat-med.com/resources/white-paper-hip-care-and-patient-reported-outcomes-pros/
    Hip-related pain is a well-recognised complaint amongst the elderly, however it can also affect young and middle-aged active adults. […] Chronic hip joint pain leads to limitations in walking, sitting and standing thus restricting the ability to work or perform everyday tasks. […] The benefits of management of OA of the hip include relief of pain and improved function resulting in improvements in quality of life. […] Without adequate management, the causative factors contributing to a patients pain may progress to avascular necrosis or OA, which is a leading cause of reduced quality of life and loss of function in elderly people thereby resulting in tremendous costs. […] Considering this, effective monitoring of a patients pain and function of the joint throughout their health journey (both clinically and self-reported) proves invaluable in optimising treatment and individualising care to ultimately conquer the plague of hip pain.
  • #2 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – Course and predictors of pain and physical functioning in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis – HTML
    https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2057
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically summarize the literature on: (i) the course of pain and physical functioning; and (ii) predictors of deterioration of pain and physical functioning in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. […] Because of high heterogeneity across studies and within study populations, no conclusions can be drawn with regard to the course of pain and physical functioning. Several clinical characteristics, health behaviours and psychosocial factors prognosticate deterioration of pain and physical functioning. […] Pain and problems with daily functioning, such as walking, climbing stairs, sitting down and rising from a chair, are common in individuals with hip osteoarthritis (OA). […] The natural course of pain and physical functioning in OA is highly individual and variable; some patients remain stable, while others improve or gradually worsen.
  • #3 Prognosis of hip pain in general practice: a prospective followup study – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050175/
    Objective: Hip pain in the elderly is the main feature of osteoarthritis of the hip. In this prospective followup study, we wanted to determine which patients with hip pain show disease progression, and what the incidence of total hip replacement (THR) is in this group of patients after 3 and 6 years of followup. […] After 3 years disease progressed in 29 (15%) patients and 23 (12%) received a THR. After 6 years disease progressed in 45 (28%) patients and 36 (22%) received a THR. The prognostic variables for a THR after 3 and 6 years related to history taking were age or = 60 years, morning stiffness, and pain in the groin/medial thigh; variables related to physical examination were decreased extension/adduction, painful internal rotation, and a body mass index or = 30 kg/m(2); and the variable related to radiologic findings was a Kellgren/Lawrence grade of 2 or higher.
  • #4 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    In a cohort with mean age 25.4 (SD 8.1) years, 72.7% female, and mean follow-up 2.6 (range 1.0-4.8) years, 429/830 hips (51.7% [95% CI 48.2%-55.1%]) progressed to surgery. […] Almost half of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain did not progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up. A trial of conservative management is likely worthwhile in most patients. […] Predictors of surgical progression in the entire cohort included younger age (OR 0.95/year [95% CI 0.93-0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 1.87-2.03, p=0.027), worse physical function (OR 0.96/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) point [0.92-0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (OR 3.47 [2.05-5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73-4.35]), and/or labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98-16.47]).
  • #5 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    Logistic regression analysis of the entire cohort of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain revealed that predictors of progression to surgery included younger age (OR 0.95 per year [0.93 to 0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 2.03 for 6-12 months [1.19 to 3.48], OR 1.97 for 1-3 years [1.22 to 3.21], and OR 1.87 for 3 or more years [1.07 to 3.25]), worse physical function (OR 0.96 per PROMIS point [0.92 to 0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of FAI (OR 3.47 [2.05 to 5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73 to 4.35]), and/or imaging-proven acetabular labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98 to 16.47]). […] Of hips that presented to a tertiary care referral center for pre-arthritic hip pain, only 51.7% indicated a decision to progress to surgery at a minimum of one year follow-up.
  • #6 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – Course and predictors of pain and physical functioning in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis – HTML
    https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2057
    Knowledge of predictors can be used to inform patients on the likely course of their condition and to adapt treatment according to the prognosis. […] Deterioration of hip pain is predicted by clinical characteristics (higher comorbidity count, additional presence of knee OA), health behaviour factors (no supervised exercise and a lower level of physical activity) and socio-demographics (lower level of education) (weak evidence). […] Deterioration in physical functioning has been investigated in 8 studies (of which 7 were high-quality studies) and is predicted by higher comorbidity count and lower vitality (strong evidence).
  • #7 Prognosis of hip pain in general practice: a prospective followup study – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050175/
    Objective: Hip pain in the elderly is the main feature of osteoarthritis of the hip. In this prospective followup study, we wanted to determine which patients with hip pain show disease progression, and what the incidence of total hip replacement (THR) is in this group of patients after 3 and 6 years of followup. […] After 3 years disease progressed in 29 (15%) patients and 23 (12%) received a THR. After 6 years disease progressed in 45 (28%) patients and 36 (22%) received a THR. The prognostic variables for a THR after 3 and 6 years related to history taking were age or = 60 years, morning stiffness, and pain in the groin/medial thigh; variables related to physical examination were decreased extension/adduction, painful internal rotation, and a body mass index or = 30 kg/m(2); and the variable related to radiologic findings was a Kellgren/Lawrence grade of 2 or higher.
  • #8 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    In a cohort with mean age 25.4 (SD 8.1) years, 72.7% female, and mean follow-up 2.6 (range 1.0-4.8) years, 429/830 hips (51.7% [95% CI 48.2%-55.1%]) progressed to surgery. […] Almost half of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain did not progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up. A trial of conservative management is likely worthwhile in most patients. […] Predictors of surgical progression in the entire cohort included younger age (OR 0.95/year [95% CI 0.93-0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 1.87-2.03, p=0.027), worse physical function (OR 0.96/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) point [0.92-0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (OR 3.47 [2.05-5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73-4.35]), and/or labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98-16.47]).
  • #9 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – Course and predictors of pain and physical functioning in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis – HTML
    https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2057
    Knowledge of predictors can be used to inform patients on the likely course of their condition and to adapt treatment according to the prognosis. […] Deterioration of hip pain is predicted by clinical characteristics (higher comorbidity count, additional presence of knee OA), health behaviour factors (no supervised exercise and a lower level of physical activity) and socio-demographics (lower level of education) (weak evidence). […] Deterioration in physical functioning has been investigated in 8 studies (of which 7 were high-quality studies) and is predicted by higher comorbidity count and lower vitality (strong evidence).
  • #10 Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review | Arthritis Research & Therapy | Full Text
    https://arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9
    Predicting which patients with hip osteoarthritis are more likely to show disease progression is important for healthcare professionals. […] We found strong evidence for more clinical progression in patients with comorbidity and more progression to total hip replacement for a higher Kellgren and Lawrence grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis. […] Strong evidence suggested that 4 factors were predictive of progression of hip osteoarthritis, whereas 12 factors were not predictive of progression. […] Strong evidence showed comorbidity to be predictive of clinical progression. […] We conclude that there is consistent evidence that four factors (comorbidity, K-L grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis) were predictive of progression of hip OA, whereas 12 factors were not predictive.
  • #11 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – Course and predictors of pain and physical functioning in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis – HTML
    https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2057
    Knowledge of predictors can be used to inform patients on the likely course of their condition and to adapt treatment according to the prognosis. […] Deterioration of hip pain is predicted by clinical characteristics (higher comorbidity count, additional presence of knee OA), health behaviour factors (no supervised exercise and a lower level of physical activity) and socio-demographics (lower level of education) (weak evidence). […] Deterioration in physical functioning has been investigated in 8 studies (of which 7 were high-quality studies) and is predicted by higher comorbidity count and lower vitality (strong evidence).
  • #12 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    In a cohort with mean age 25.4 (SD 8.1) years, 72.7% female, and mean follow-up 2.6 (range 1.0-4.8) years, 429/830 hips (51.7% [95% CI 48.2%-55.1%]) progressed to surgery. […] Almost half of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain did not progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up. A trial of conservative management is likely worthwhile in most patients. […] Predictors of surgical progression in the entire cohort included younger age (OR 0.95/year [95% CI 0.93-0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 1.87-2.03, p=0.027), worse physical function (OR 0.96/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) point [0.92-0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (OR 3.47 [2.05-5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73-4.35]), and/or labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98-16.47]).
  • #13 Prognosis of hip pain in general practice: a prospective followup study – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050175/
    Objective: Hip pain in the elderly is the main feature of osteoarthritis of the hip. In this prospective followup study, we wanted to determine which patients with hip pain show disease progression, and what the incidence of total hip replacement (THR) is in this group of patients after 3 and 6 years of followup. […] After 3 years disease progressed in 29 (15%) patients and 23 (12%) received a THR. After 6 years disease progressed in 45 (28%) patients and 36 (22%) received a THR. The prognostic variables for a THR after 3 and 6 years related to history taking were age or = 60 years, morning stiffness, and pain in the groin/medial thigh; variables related to physical examination were decreased extension/adduction, painful internal rotation, and a body mass index or = 30 kg/m(2); and the variable related to radiologic findings was a Kellgren/Lawrence grade of 2 or higher.
  • #14 Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review | Arthritis Research & Therapy | Full Text
    https://arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9
    Predicting which patients with hip osteoarthritis are more likely to show disease progression is important for healthcare professionals. […] We found strong evidence for more clinical progression in patients with comorbidity and more progression to total hip replacement for a higher Kellgren and Lawrence grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis. […] Strong evidence suggested that 4 factors were predictive of progression of hip osteoarthritis, whereas 12 factors were not predictive of progression. […] Strong evidence showed comorbidity to be predictive of clinical progression. […] We conclude that there is consistent evidence that four factors (comorbidity, K-L grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis) were predictive of progression of hip OA, whereas 12 factors were not predictive.
  • #15 Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review | Arthritis Research & Therapy | Full Text
    https://arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9
    Predicting which patients with hip osteoarthritis are more likely to show disease progression is important for healthcare professionals. […] We found strong evidence for more clinical progression in patients with comorbidity and more progression to total hip replacement for a higher Kellgren and Lawrence grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis. […] Strong evidence suggested that 4 factors were predictive of progression of hip osteoarthritis, whereas 12 factors were not predictive of progression. […] Strong evidence showed comorbidity to be predictive of clinical progression. […] We conclude that there is consistent evidence that four factors (comorbidity, K-L grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis) were predictive of progression of hip OA, whereas 12 factors were not predictive.
  • #16 Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review | Arthritis Research & Therapy | Full Text
    https://arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9
    Predicting which patients with hip osteoarthritis are more likely to show disease progression is important for healthcare professionals. […] We found strong evidence for more clinical progression in patients with comorbidity and more progression to total hip replacement for a higher Kellgren and Lawrence grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis. […] Strong evidence suggested that 4 factors were predictive of progression of hip osteoarthritis, whereas 12 factors were not predictive of progression. […] Strong evidence showed comorbidity to be predictive of clinical progression. […] We conclude that there is consistent evidence that four factors (comorbidity, K-L grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis) were predictive of progression of hip OA, whereas 12 factors were not predictive.
  • #17 Prognosis of hip pain in general practice: a prospective followup study – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050175/
    Objective: Hip pain in the elderly is the main feature of osteoarthritis of the hip. In this prospective followup study, we wanted to determine which patients with hip pain show disease progression, and what the incidence of total hip replacement (THR) is in this group of patients after 3 and 6 years of followup. […] After 3 years disease progressed in 29 (15%) patients and 23 (12%) received a THR. After 6 years disease progressed in 45 (28%) patients and 36 (22%) received a THR. The prognostic variables for a THR after 3 and 6 years related to history taking were age or = 60 years, morning stiffness, and pain in the groin/medial thigh; variables related to physical examination were decreased extension/adduction, painful internal rotation, and a body mass index or = 30 kg/m(2); and the variable related to radiologic findings was a Kellgren/Lawrence grade of 2 or higher.
  • #18 Prognosis of hip pain in general practice: a prospective followup study – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050175/
    Objective: Hip pain in the elderly is the main feature of osteoarthritis of the hip. In this prospective followup study, we wanted to determine which patients with hip pain show disease progression, and what the incidence of total hip replacement (THR) is in this group of patients after 3 and 6 years of followup. […] After 3 years disease progressed in 29 (15%) patients and 23 (12%) received a THR. After 6 years disease progressed in 45 (28%) patients and 36 (22%) received a THR. The prognostic variables for a THR after 3 and 6 years related to history taking were age or = 60 years, morning stiffness, and pain in the groin/medial thigh; variables related to physical examination were decreased extension/adduction, painful internal rotation, and a body mass index or = 30 kg/m(2); and the variable related to radiologic findings was a Kellgren/Lawrence grade of 2 or higher.
  • #19 Prognosis of hip pain in general practice: a prospective followup study – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050175/
    Objective: Hip pain in the elderly is the main feature of osteoarthritis of the hip. In this prospective followup study, we wanted to determine which patients with hip pain show disease progression, and what the incidence of total hip replacement (THR) is in this group of patients after 3 and 6 years of followup. […] After 3 years disease progressed in 29 (15%) patients and 23 (12%) received a THR. After 6 years disease progressed in 45 (28%) patients and 36 (22%) received a THR. The prognostic variables for a THR after 3 and 6 years related to history taking were age or = 60 years, morning stiffness, and pain in the groin/medial thigh; variables related to physical examination were decreased extension/adduction, painful internal rotation, and a body mass index or = 30 kg/m(2); and the variable related to radiologic findings was a Kellgren/Lawrence grade of 2 or higher.
  • #20 Prognosis of hip pain in general practice: a prospective followup study – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050175/
    Objective: Hip pain in the elderly is the main feature of osteoarthritis of the hip. In this prospective followup study, we wanted to determine which patients with hip pain show disease progression, and what the incidence of total hip replacement (THR) is in this group of patients after 3 and 6 years of followup. […] After 3 years disease progressed in 29 (15%) patients and 23 (12%) received a THR. After 6 years disease progressed in 45 (28%) patients and 36 (22%) received a THR. The prognostic variables for a THR after 3 and 6 years related to history taking were age or = 60 years, morning stiffness, and pain in the groin/medial thigh; variables related to physical examination were decreased extension/adduction, painful internal rotation, and a body mass index or = 30 kg/m(2); and the variable related to radiologic findings was a Kellgren/Lawrence grade of 2 or higher.
  • #21 Prognosis of hip pain in general practice: a prospective followup study – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050175/
    Objective: Hip pain in the elderly is the main feature of osteoarthritis of the hip. In this prospective followup study, we wanted to determine which patients with hip pain show disease progression, and what the incidence of total hip replacement (THR) is in this group of patients after 3 and 6 years of followup. […] After 3 years disease progressed in 29 (15%) patients and 23 (12%) received a THR. After 6 years disease progressed in 45 (28%) patients and 36 (22%) received a THR. The prognostic variables for a THR after 3 and 6 years related to history taking were age or = 60 years, morning stiffness, and pain in the groin/medial thigh; variables related to physical examination were decreased extension/adduction, painful internal rotation, and a body mass index or = 30 kg/m(2); and the variable related to radiologic findings was a Kellgren/Lawrence grade of 2 or higher.
  • #22 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    In a cohort with mean age 25.4 (SD 8.1) years, 72.7% female, and mean follow-up 2.6 (range 1.0-4.8) years, 429/830 hips (51.7% [95% CI 48.2%-55.1%]) progressed to surgery. […] Almost half of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain did not progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up. A trial of conservative management is likely worthwhile in most patients. […] Predictors of surgical progression in the entire cohort included younger age (OR 0.95/year [95% CI 0.93-0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 1.87-2.03, p=0.027), worse physical function (OR 0.96/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) point [0.92-0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (OR 3.47 [2.05-5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73-4.35]), and/or labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98-16.47]).
  • #23 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    In a cohort with mean age 25.4 (SD 8.1) years, 72.7% female, and mean follow-up 2.6 (range 1.0-4.8) years, 429/830 hips (51.7% [95% CI 48.2%-55.1%]) progressed to surgery. […] Almost half of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain did not progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up. A trial of conservative management is likely worthwhile in most patients. […] Predictors of surgical progression in the entire cohort included younger age (OR 0.95/year [95% CI 0.93-0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 1.87-2.03, p=0.027), worse physical function (OR 0.96/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) point [0.92-0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (OR 3.47 [2.05-5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73-4.35]), and/or labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98-16.47]).
  • #24 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    Logistic regression analysis of the entire cohort of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain revealed that predictors of progression to surgery included younger age (OR 0.95 per year [0.93 to 0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 2.03 for 6-12 months [1.19 to 3.48], OR 1.97 for 1-3 years [1.22 to 3.21], and OR 1.87 for 3 or more years [1.07 to 3.25]), worse physical function (OR 0.96 per PROMIS point [0.92 to 0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of FAI (OR 3.47 [2.05 to 5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73 to 4.35]), and/or imaging-proven acetabular labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98 to 16.47]). […] Of hips that presented to a tertiary care referral center for pre-arthritic hip pain, only 51.7% indicated a decision to progress to surgery at a minimum of one year follow-up.
  • #25 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    In a cohort with mean age 25.4 (SD 8.1) years, 72.7% female, and mean follow-up 2.6 (range 1.0-4.8) years, 429/830 hips (51.7% [95% CI 48.2%-55.1%]) progressed to surgery. […] Almost half of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain did not progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up. A trial of conservative management is likely worthwhile in most patients. […] Predictors of surgical progression in the entire cohort included younger age (OR 0.95/year [95% CI 0.93-0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 1.87-2.03, p=0.027), worse physical function (OR 0.96/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) point [0.92-0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (OR 3.47 [2.05-5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73-4.35]), and/or labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98-16.47]).
  • #26 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    Logistic regression analysis of the entire cohort of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain revealed that predictors of progression to surgery included younger age (OR 0.95 per year [0.93 to 0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 2.03 for 6-12 months [1.19 to 3.48], OR 1.97 for 1-3 years [1.22 to 3.21], and OR 1.87 for 3 or more years [1.07 to 3.25]), worse physical function (OR 0.96 per PROMIS point [0.92 to 0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of FAI (OR 3.47 [2.05 to 5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73 to 4.35]), and/or imaging-proven acetabular labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98 to 16.47]). […] Of hips that presented to a tertiary care referral center for pre-arthritic hip pain, only 51.7% indicated a decision to progress to surgery at a minimum of one year follow-up.
  • #27 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    In a cohort with mean age 25.4 (SD 8.1) years, 72.7% female, and mean follow-up 2.6 (range 1.0-4.8) years, 429/830 hips (51.7% [95% CI 48.2%-55.1%]) progressed to surgery. […] Almost half of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain did not progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up. A trial of conservative management is likely worthwhile in most patients. […] Predictors of surgical progression in the entire cohort included younger age (OR 0.95/year [95% CI 0.93-0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 1.87-2.03, p=0.027), worse physical function (OR 0.96/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) point [0.92-0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (OR 3.47 [2.05-5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73-4.35]), and/or labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98-16.47]).
  • #28 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    Logistic regression analysis of the entire cohort of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain revealed that predictors of progression to surgery included younger age (OR 0.95 per year [0.93 to 0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 2.03 for 6-12 months [1.19 to 3.48], OR 1.97 for 1-3 years [1.22 to 3.21], and OR 1.87 for 3 or more years [1.07 to 3.25]), worse physical function (OR 0.96 per PROMIS point [0.92 to 0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of FAI (OR 3.47 [2.05 to 5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73 to 4.35]), and/or imaging-proven acetabular labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98 to 16.47]). […] Of hips that presented to a tertiary care referral center for pre-arthritic hip pain, only 51.7% indicated a decision to progress to surgery at a minimum of one year follow-up.
  • #29 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – Course and predictors of pain and physical functioning in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis – HTML
    https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2057
    Knowledge of predictors can be used to inform patients on the likely course of their condition and to adapt treatment according to the prognosis. […] Deterioration of hip pain is predicted by clinical characteristics (higher comorbidity count, additional presence of knee OA), health behaviour factors (no supervised exercise and a lower level of physical activity) and socio-demographics (lower level of education) (weak evidence). […] Deterioration in physical functioning has been investigated in 8 studies (of which 7 were high-quality studies) and is predicted by higher comorbidity count and lower vitality (strong evidence).
  • #30 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – Course and predictors of pain and physical functioning in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis – HTML
    https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2057
    Knowledge of predictors can be used to inform patients on the likely course of their condition and to adapt treatment according to the prognosis. […] Deterioration of hip pain is predicted by clinical characteristics (higher comorbidity count, additional presence of knee OA), health behaviour factors (no supervised exercise and a lower level of physical activity) and socio-demographics (lower level of education) (weak evidence). […] Deterioration in physical functioning has been investigated in 8 studies (of which 7 were high-quality studies) and is predicted by higher comorbidity count and lower vitality (strong evidence).
  • #31 Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – Course and predictors of pain and physical functioning in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis – HTML
    https://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/html/10.2340/16501977-2057
    Knowledge of predictors can be used to inform patients on the likely course of their condition and to adapt treatment according to the prognosis. […] Deterioration of hip pain is predicted by clinical characteristics (higher comorbidity count, additional presence of knee OA), health behaviour factors (no supervised exercise and a lower level of physical activity) and socio-demographics (lower level of education) (weak evidence). […] Deterioration in physical functioning has been investigated in 8 studies (of which 7 were high-quality studies) and is predicted by higher comorbidity count and lower vitality (strong evidence).
  • #32 Prognostics for pain in osteoarthritis: Do clinical measures predict pain after total joint replacement? | PLOS One
    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222370
    A significant proportion of osteoarthritis (OA) patients continue to experience moderate to severe pain after total joint replacement (TJR). […] Pre-surgical pain levels were not related to post-surgical residual pain. […] Our results show that although tested clinical and biopsychosocial variables reorganize after TJR in OA, their presurgical values are not predictive of post-surgery pain. […] Derivation of prognostic markers for pain persistence after TJR will require more comprehensive understanding of underlying mechanisms. […] Pain intensity prior to surgery, disproportion between pain intensity and articular damage, neuropathic-like symptoms, psychosocial factors such as pain catastrophizing and poor coping strategies are commonly referenced as important predictive factors. […] Our main aims are: 1) Test if baseline pain ratings relate to post-surgery pain levels; 2) examine how distinct pain measurement instruments relate to different clinical and biopsychological aspects of OA pain; 3) develop and evaluate models predictive of pain and pain relief after TJR; 4) use network analysis to assess the reorganization of pain related clinical and biopsychosocial properties of the personality of KOA and HOA patients after TJR.
  • #33 Prognostics for pain in osteoarthritis: Do clinical measures predict pain after total joint replacement? | PLOS One
    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222370
    Our regression models showed that commonly assessed clinical and behavioral measures prior to surgery fail to reliably predict pain outcomes after TJR. […] Pain outcomes concerning persistency are commonly studied using primarily the absolute value of pain intensity after surgery, or dichotomizing the outcome using a fixed threshold that varies across studies. […] Our results are generally consistent with this definition and further advance the concept. […] Our analysis, especially for KOA where we examined multiple models, suggests that the post-operative pain is minimally related to the pre-operative pain properties. […] We observed larger changes in clustering coefficient and in modularity in HOA, implying that the pain personality in HOA is being fractured with pain relief, rendering different factors independent from each other.
  • #34 Prognostics for pain in osteoarthritis: Do clinical measures predict pain after total joint replacement? | PLOS One
    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222370
    A significant proportion of osteoarthritis (OA) patients continue to experience moderate to severe pain after total joint replacement (TJR). […] Pre-surgical pain levels were not related to post-surgical residual pain. […] Our results show that although tested clinical and biopsychosocial variables reorganize after TJR in OA, their presurgical values are not predictive of post-surgery pain. […] Derivation of prognostic markers for pain persistence after TJR will require more comprehensive understanding of underlying mechanisms. […] Pain intensity prior to surgery, disproportion between pain intensity and articular damage, neuropathic-like symptoms, psychosocial factors such as pain catastrophizing and poor coping strategies are commonly referenced as important predictive factors. […] Our main aims are: 1) Test if baseline pain ratings relate to post-surgery pain levels; 2) examine how distinct pain measurement instruments relate to different clinical and biopsychological aspects of OA pain; 3) develop and evaluate models predictive of pain and pain relief after TJR; 4) use network analysis to assess the reorganization of pain related clinical and biopsychosocial properties of the personality of KOA and HOA patients after TJR.
  • #35 Objective characterization of hip pain levels during walking by combining quantitative electroencephalography with machine learning | Scientific Reports
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-82696-1
    Pain is an undesirable sensory experience that can induce depression and limit individuals activities of daily living, in turn negatively impacting the labor force. […] We show that brain wave amplitude differed significantly between patients with hip pain and those without, and that those differences enabled us to objectively determine the degree of pain using machine learning. […] Our system represents a useful, non-invasive tool to estimate hip pain during walking. […] We observed that amplitude was significantly higher in some frequencies in the Pain (+) than Pain () group. […] These results suggest that pain levels can be recognized objectively by an EEG pattern. […] Our system enables us to evaluate individual hip pain by monitoring EEG. This system could be useful to characterize patients pain, such as low back pain and OA, during ADL, to determine whether operative therapy is indicated, or to monitor effects of pain treatment. […] Overall, we conclude that our system is a useful tool to monitor patients pain during ADL non-invasively and objectively.
  • #36 Objective characterization of hip pain levels during walking by combining quantitative electroencephalography with machine learning | Scientific Reports
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-82696-1
    Pain is an undesirable sensory experience that can induce depression and limit individuals activities of daily living, in turn negatively impacting the labor force. […] We show that brain wave amplitude differed significantly between patients with hip pain and those without, and that those differences enabled us to objectively determine the degree of pain using machine learning. […] Our system represents a useful, non-invasive tool to estimate hip pain during walking. […] We observed that amplitude was significantly higher in some frequencies in the Pain (+) than Pain () group. […] These results suggest that pain levels can be recognized objectively by an EEG pattern. […] Our system enables us to evaluate individual hip pain by monitoring EEG. This system could be useful to characterize patients pain, such as low back pain and OA, during ADL, to determine whether operative therapy is indicated, or to monitor effects of pain treatment. […] Overall, we conclude that our system is a useful tool to monitor patients pain during ADL non-invasively and objectively.
  • #37 White Paper: Hip Care and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) – Heartbeat Medical
    https://heartbeat-med.com/resources/white-paper-hip-care-and-patient-reported-outcomes-pros/
    Joint replacement surgery (hip and knee replacement) is considered the most effective intervention for severe OA, reducing pain and disability and restoring some patients to near normal function. […] PROMs are essential to accurately examine and compare the effects of different treatments on disability in those with hip disorders. […] PROMs are frequently used and recommended to support clinical decision-making, health policies and reimbursement processes. […] Thus, PROs can provide individual physicians and the orthopedic community with data that, when combined with relevant clinical measures, improve the ability to risk-stratify patients into those more likely to improve following surgery and those who are less likely to benefit. […] The inclusion of PROMs collection of patients pre and post-operatively has long been cited to flag potential complications earlier, reduce morbidity, reduce revision-rates and improve the quality of care patients receive through enhanced care team communication feedback loops.
  • #38 White Paper: Hip Care and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) – Heartbeat Medical
    https://heartbeat-med.com/resources/white-paper-hip-care-and-patient-reported-outcomes-pros/
    Joint replacement surgery (hip and knee replacement) is considered the most effective intervention for severe OA, reducing pain and disability and restoring some patients to near normal function. […] PROMs are essential to accurately examine and compare the effects of different treatments on disability in those with hip disorders. […] PROMs are frequently used and recommended to support clinical decision-making, health policies and reimbursement processes. […] Thus, PROs can provide individual physicians and the orthopedic community with data that, when combined with relevant clinical measures, improve the ability to risk-stratify patients into those more likely to improve following surgery and those who are less likely to benefit. […] The inclusion of PROMs collection of patients pre and post-operatively has long been cited to flag potential complications earlier, reduce morbidity, reduce revision-rates and improve the quality of care patients receive through enhanced care team communication feedback loops.
  • #39 White Paper: Hip Care and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) – Heartbeat Medical
    https://heartbeat-med.com/resources/white-paper-hip-care-and-patient-reported-outcomes-pros/
    The study showed that the functional status of a large cohort of patients significantly improved after total hip and knee replacement, based on routine patient-reported and clinical data collection and aided the prediction of those with poorer outcomes at earlier stages. […] The importance of sports participation also applies to the non-athlete as more and more people want to preserve their mobility for longer to improve their quality of life. […] The collaboration of insurers, healthcare providers, IT providers and most importantly, patients are taking information derived from PROMs inclusion in orthopaedic surgery to the next level deriving new insights as well as encouraging more widespread use.
  • #40 Prognostic factors for progression of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review | Arthritis Research & Therapy | Full Text
    https://arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13075-019-1969-9
    Predicting which patients with hip osteoarthritis are more likely to show disease progression is important for healthcare professionals. […] We found strong evidence for more clinical progression in patients with comorbidity and more progression to total hip replacement for a higher Kellgren and Lawrence grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis. […] Strong evidence suggested that 4 factors were predictive of progression of hip osteoarthritis, whereas 12 factors were not predictive of progression. […] Strong evidence showed comorbidity to be predictive of clinical progression. […] We conclude that there is consistent evidence that four factors (comorbidity, K-L grade, superior or (supero) lateral femoral head migration, and subchondral sclerosis) were predictive of progression of hip OA, whereas 12 factors were not predictive.
  • #41 Prognosis of hip pain in general practice: a prospective followup study – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18050175/
    In this study population, approximately 12% of patients presenting with hip pain to their general practitioner will undergo a THR within 3 years, and approximately 22% after 6 years. Using the variables obtained from history taking, physical examination, and radiologic findings enables better identification of persons at high risk for a THR.
  • #42 Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9149117/
    In a cohort with mean age 25.4 (SD 8.1) years, 72.7% female, and mean follow-up 2.6 (range 1.0-4.8) years, 429/830 hips (51.7% [95% CI 48.2%-55.1%]) progressed to surgery. […] Almost half of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain did not progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up. A trial of conservative management is likely worthwhile in most patients. […] Predictors of surgical progression in the entire cohort included younger age (OR 0.95/year [95% CI 0.93-0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 1.87-2.03, p=0.027), worse physical function (OR 0.96/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) point [0.92-0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (OR 3.47 [2.05-5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73-4.35]), and/or labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98-16.47]).
  • #43 White Paper: Hip Care and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) – Heartbeat Medical
    https://heartbeat-med.com/resources/white-paper-hip-care-and-patient-reported-outcomes-pros/
    Hip-related pain is a well-recognised complaint amongst the elderly, however it can also affect young and middle-aged active adults. […] Chronic hip joint pain leads to limitations in walking, sitting and standing thus restricting the ability to work or perform everyday tasks. […] The benefits of management of OA of the hip include relief of pain and improved function resulting in improvements in quality of life. […] Without adequate management, the causative factors contributing to a patients pain may progress to avascular necrosis or OA, which is a leading cause of reduced quality of life and loss of function in elderly people thereby resulting in tremendous costs. […] Considering this, effective monitoring of a patients pain and function of the joint throughout their health journey (both clinically and self-reported) proves invaluable in optimising treatment and individualising care to ultimately conquer the plague of hip pain.
  • #44 White Paper: Hip Care and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) – Heartbeat Medical
    https://heartbeat-med.com/resources/white-paper-hip-care-and-patient-reported-outcomes-pros/
    Joint replacement surgery (hip and knee replacement) is considered the most effective intervention for severe OA, reducing pain and disability and restoring some patients to near normal function. […] PROMs are essential to accurately examine and compare the effects of different treatments on disability in those with hip disorders. […] PROMs are frequently used and recommended to support clinical decision-making, health policies and reimbursement processes. […] Thus, PROs can provide individual physicians and the orthopedic community with data that, when combined with relevant clinical measures, improve the ability to risk-stratify patients into those more likely to improve following surgery and those who are less likely to benefit. […] The inclusion of PROMs collection of patients pre and post-operatively has long been cited to flag potential complications earlier, reduce morbidity, reduce revision-rates and improve the quality of care patients receive through enhanced care team communication feedback loops.
  • #45 White Paper: Hip Care and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) – Heartbeat Medical
    https://heartbeat-med.com/resources/white-paper-hip-care-and-patient-reported-outcomes-pros/
    Hip-related pain is a well-recognised complaint amongst the elderly, however it can also affect young and middle-aged active adults. […] Chronic hip joint pain leads to limitations in walking, sitting and standing thus restricting the ability to work or perform everyday tasks. […] The benefits of management of OA of the hip include relief of pain and improved function resulting in improvements in quality of life. […] Without adequate management, the causative factors contributing to a patients pain may progress to avascular necrosis or OA, which is a leading cause of reduced quality of life and loss of function in elderly people thereby resulting in tremendous costs. […] Considering this, effective monitoring of a patients pain and function of the joint throughout their health journey (both clinically and self-reported) proves invaluable in optimising treatment and individualising care to ultimately conquer the plague of hip pain.