Kraniosynostoza
Epidemiologia

Kraniosynostoza to przedwczesne zarośnięcie szwów czaszkowych, prowadzące do deformacji czaszki, podwyższonego ciśnienia wewnątrzczaszkowego oraz zaburzeń neurokognitywnych. Epidemiologicznie częstość występowania wynosi klasycznie 1 na 2000-2500 żywych urodzeń, a metaanaliza globalna wskazuje na 5,9 na 10 000 (95% CI: 3,9-8,4). W krajach rozwiniętych obserwuje się wzrost częstości, np. w Norwegii do 5,5 na 10 000 (1/1800), w Szwecji 7,7 na 10 000, a w Holandii z 2,6 do 6,4 na 10 000 w latach 1997-2007. Dominującym typem jest kraniosynostoza strzałkowa (50-60%), następnie wieńcowa jednostronna (20-25%), metopowa (10-15%) i lambdoidalna (2-5%). Wzrost częstości dotyczy zwłaszcza kraniosynostozy metopowej, z rocznym wzrostem o 6% w Holandii (p=0,029). Kraniosynostoza dzieli się na niesyndromatyczną (75-80%) i syndromatyczną (20-25%), z istotnym udziałem czynników genetycznych (ok. 20% przypadków). Rozkład płciowy wykazuje przewagę chłopców (stosunek 3:1), szczególnie w kraniosynostozie strzałkowej (4:1) i metopowej (3:1), podczas gdy wieńcowa częściej dotyczy dziewcząt (3:2).

Epidemiologia kraniosynostozy

Kraniosynostoza to stan charakteryzujący się przedwczesnym zarośnięciem szwów czaszkowych, co powoduje deformacje czaszki i może prowadzić do zwiększonego ciśnienia wewnątrzczaszkowego, zaburzeń neurokognitywnych oraz problemów psychospołecznych, jeśli nie zostanie odpowiednio leczona. Epidemiologia tego schorzenia dostarcza istotnych informacji na temat częstości występowania, czynników ryzyka oraz tendencji w populacji.1

Częstotliwość występowania

Częstość występowania kraniosynostozy jest przedmiotem wielu badań epidemiologicznych na całym świecie, a wyniki pokazują pewne różnice w zależności od regionu geograficznego i zastosowanych metod badawczych:

  • Klasycznie podawana częstość występowania wynosi 1 na 2000-2500 żywych urodzeń23
  • Metaanaliza przeprowadzona w ramach globalnego badania epidemiologicznego wykazała, że ogólna częstość występowania wynosi 5,9 na 10 000 żywych urodzeń (95% CI: 3,9-8,4)4
  • W niektórych krajach zauważono znacznie wyższą częstość występowania – w Norwegii odnotowano wzrost częstości do 5,5 na 10 000 żywych urodzeń (1/1800) w ostatnim pięcioletnim okresie badawczym5
  • W Szwecji odnotowano częstość 7,7 przypadków na 10 000 żywych urodzeń6
  • W Holandii zaobserwowano wzrost częstości występowania z 2,6 na 10 000 żywych urodzeń w 1997 roku do 6,4 w 2007 roku7

Obserwuje się zatem tendencję wzrostową w częstości występowania kraniosynostozy w wielu krajach rozwiniętych, co może być związane zarówno z rzeczywistym wzrostem liczby przypadków, jak i z poprawą diagnostyki i systemów nadzoru.89

Typy kraniosynostozy i ich rozpowszechnienie

Kraniosynostoza jest klasyfikowana na podstawie szwów czaszkowych, które uległy przedwczesnemu zarośnięciu. Dane epidemiologiczne pokazują następujący rozkład poszczególnych typów:1011

  • Kraniosynostoza strzałkowa – występuje w 50-60% przypadków
  • Kraniosynostoza wieńcowa jednostronna – występuje w 20-25% przypadków
  • Kraniosynostoza czołowa (metopowa) – występuje w około 10-15% przypadków
  • Kraniosynostoza potyliczna (lambdoidalna) – występuje w 2-5% przypadków

Warto zauważyć, że w ostatnich latach w wielu krajach odnotowano znaczący wzrost częstości występowania kraniosynostozy metopowej. W Holandii zaobserwowano istotny wzrost o 6% rocznie (p = 0,029), a udział kraniosynostozy metopowej wzrósł z średnio 20% w latach 1997-2000 do 27% w latach 2001-2007 (p = 0,046).12 Podobne tendencje wzrostowe dotyczące kraniosynostozy metopowej zaobserwowano w Australii i Stanach Zjednoczonych.13

Klasyfikacja kliniczna

Pod względem klinicznym kraniosynostozę dzieli się na dwie główne kategorie:1415

  • Kraniosynostoza niesyndromatyczna (izolowana) – stanowi około 75-80% wszystkich przypadków i dotyczy zarośnięcia jednego lub rzadziej więcej szwów czaszkowych bez towarzyszących wad wrodzonych
  • Kraniosynostoza syndromatyczna – stanowi około 20-25% przypadków i występuje jako część rozpoznawalnych zespołów genetycznych, często z towarzyszącymi wadami innych narządów

W badaniu norweskim wykazano, że kraniosynostoza syndromatyczna stanowiła 27% wszystkich przypadków, a częstość jej występowania pozostawała stabilna w trzech pięcioletnich okresach badawczych.16 W badaniu oksfordzkim udało się zidentyfikować przyczynę genetyczną w 21% przypadków kraniosynostozy, w tym 86% stanowiły zaburzenia jednego genu, a 15% aberracje chromosomowe.17

Różnice związane z płcią

Dane epidemiologiczne dotyczące rozkładu płci w kraniosynostozie wykazują zróżnicowane wyniki w zależności od typu zarośniętego szwu:

  • Ogólnie, kraniosynostoza występuje częściej u chłopców niż u dziewcząt, z proporcją około 3:118
  • Kraniosynostoza strzałkowa wykazuje wyraźną przewagę u płci męskiej (stosunek 4:1)19
  • Kraniosynostoza metopowa również częściej występuje u chłopców (stosunek 3:1)20
  • Kraniosynostoza wieńcowa stanowi wyjątek, występując częściej u dziewcząt (stosunek 3:2)21

Niektóre źródła wskazują jednak na bardziej równomierny rozkład płci, zwłaszcza w przypadku kraniosynostozy lambdoidalnej (stosunek 1:1).22

Zmienność geograficzna i etniczna

Badania epidemiologiczne wskazują na pewne różnice w częstości występowania kraniosynostozy w zależności od pochodzenia etnicznego i regionu geograficznego. Dane z kalifornijskiego systemu monitorowania wad wrodzonych za lata 2018-2020 pokazują następujące wskaźniki częstości występowania kraniosynostozy na 10 000 żywych urodzeń według grup etnicznych:23

Grupa etniczna Częstość (na 10 000 żywych urodzeń)
Biała/nie-Hiszpanie 6,6
Hiszpanie 5,0
Azjaci/nie-Hiszpanie 2,1
Rdzenni Amerykanie/mieszkańcy Alaski, rdzenni Hawajczycy/mieszkańcy Wysp Pacyfiku, inni/nie-Hiszpanie 2,6
Czarni/nie-Hiszpanie 0,7

Dane te wskazują na znacznie wyższą częstość występowania kraniosynostozy wśród populacji białej nie-hiszpańskiej w porównaniu z innymi grupami etnicznymi, przy czym najniższą częstość odnotowano wśród osób rasy czarnej. Te różnice mogą wynikać z czynników genetycznych, środowiskowych lub różnic w dostępie do opieki zdrowotnej i diagnostyki.24

Istnieją również znaczące różnice geograficzne w zgłaszanej częstości występowania kraniosynostozy. Na przykład, częstość występowania w Luizjanie w latach 2014-2017 wynosiła 10,7 na 10 000 żywych urodzeń, podczas gdy w Illinois w tym samym okresie wynosiła 5,5 na 10 000 żywych urodzeń.2526

Czynniki ryzyka kraniosynostozy

Zidentyfikowano szereg czynników ryzyka związanych z wystąpieniem kraniosynostozy:2728

  • Czynniki genetyczne – odpowiadają za około 20% przypadków, zwłaszcza w kraniosynostozie syndromatycznej
  • Czynniki matczyne:
    • Palenie tytoniu w czasie ciąży
    • Narażenie na teratogeny w okresie płodowym
    • Cukrzyca ciążowa
    • Nadmierne spożycie kofeiny
    • Choroby tarczycy
    • Zaawansowany wiek matki
  • Czynniki płodowe:
    • Ograniczenie wewnątrzmaciczne
    • Pozycja płodu
    • Niska masa urodzeniowa
    • Wcześniactwo
    • Ciąża mnoga
  • Czynniki środowiskowe:
    • Ekspozycja zawodowa rodziców – badania wykazały podwyższone ryzyko kraniosynostozy u dzieci, których ojcowie pracowali w rolnictwie i leśnictwie (OR = 2,3; 95% CI = 1,0-5,2) oraz jako mechanicy i pracownicy napraw (OR = 2,7; 95% CI = 1,2-6,1)29

Badanie z Wiktorii w Australii wykazało, że wzrost częstości występowania kraniosynostozy metopowej może być związany ze zwiększoną częstością ciąż mnogich, wcześniactwa, niskiej masy urodzeniowej i wysokiego wieku matki w populacji wiktoriańskiej w latach 1982-2008.30

Rodzinne występowanie kraniosynostozy

Badania epidemiologiczne wskazują na znaczenie czynników genetycznych w etiologii zarówno syndromatycznej, jak i niesyndromatycznej kraniosynostozy:

  • W kraniosynostozie wieńcowej niesyndromatycznej (cNSC) około 5-14% pacjentów ma pozytywny wywiad rodzinny31
  • Specyficzną etiologię genetyczną zidentyfikowano w około 25% przypadków cNSC32
  • Badanie norweskie wykazało wysoką liczbę przypadków rodzinnych zarówno w kraniosynostozie syndromatycznej, jak i niesyndromatycznej, co podkreśla znaczenie genetyki jako przyczyny tej wady33

Duża liczba przypadków rodzinnych w kraniosynostozie niesyndromatycznej sugeruje podłoże genetyczne, oprócz bardziej ustalonego udziału genetycznego w kraniosynostozie syndromatycznej.34

Systemy nadzoru i monitorowanie epidemiologiczne

Monitoring częstości występowania kraniosynostozy jest istotny dla zrozumienia możliwych przyczyn i metod zapobiegania. W Stanach Zjednoczonych 44 stany oraz Portoryko posiadają systemy nadzoru wad wrodzonych, które raportują dane do National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN).35

W Szwecji dzięki programom informacyjnym wśród personelu medycznego i systemowi wczesnej diagnostyki poprzez szybką komunikację, uzyskane dane odzwierciedlają rzeczywistą częstość występowania kraniosynostozy w populacji szwedzkiej. Aktualizacja danych dotyczących częstości występowania ułatwia planowanie opieki zdrowotnej i umożliwia dokładniejsze badania potencjalnych zmian w częstości występowania kraniosynostozy.36

W krajach rozwijających się czynniki społeczne, kulturowe, demograficzne i ekonomiczne odgrywają istotną rolę w leczeniu kraniosynostozy. Często pacjenci są kierowani do specjalistycznych ośrodków z opóźnieniem (około 1 roku życia) na pierwszą ocenę przez zespół kraniofacjalny. Jest to częściowo spowodowane niewystarczającym nadzorem medycznym i obserwacją pacjentów i rodzin mieszkających na obszarach wiejskich i w małych miasteczkach oraz w rodzinach o niskim poziomie świadomości kulturowej.37

Trendy czasowe w epidemiologii kraniosynostozy

Liczne badania wskazują na wzrost częstości występowania kraniosynostozy w ostatnich dekadach:

  • W Norwegii częstość występowania znacząco wzrosła w okresie badania, osiągając 5,5 na 10 000 żywych urodzeń (1/1800) w ostatnim pięcioletnim okresie38
  • W Holandii częstość występowania kraniosynostozy wzrosła z 2,6 na 10 000 żywych urodzeń w 1997 roku do 6,4 w 2007 roku39
  • W Wiktorii (Australia) częstość występowania niesyndromatycznej kraniosynostozy wzrastała średnio o 2,5% rocznie, a kraniosynostozy metopowej znacząco wzrosła o 7,1% rocznie w ciągu 25 lat40

Wzrost w ciągu trzech pięcioletnich okresów w Norwegii był znaczący dla osób z kraniosynostozą niesyndromatyczną i/lub zarośnięciem szwów pośrodkowych, a także dla osób z rzadkimi zespołami genetycznymi.41

Globalne obciążenie chorobowe

Badania epidemiologiczne wskazują, że kraniosynostoza stanowi istotne obciążenie zdrowotne na skalę globalną:

  • Szacuje się, że w 2019 roku na całym świecie urodziło się 84 665 dzieci z kraniosynostozą (95% CI: 55 965-120 540), w tym 72 857 (95% CI: 47 637-120 280) z kraniosynostozą niesyndromatyczną42
  • Krajowe i międzynarodowe inicjatywy mające na celu zwiększenie możliwości badań epidemiologicznych i opieki klinicznej w zakresie kraniosynostozy są uzasadnione, szczególnie w krajach o niskim i średnim dochodzie43

Kraniosynostoza jest ważnym problemem zdrowotnym, który wpływa na rozwój neurokognitywny i szkieletowy czaszkowo-twarzowy dzieci na całym świecie. Wczesne rozpoznanie i odpowiednie leczenie mają kluczowe znaczenie dla zapobiegania potencjalnym długoterminowym powikłaniom i następstwom.4445

Implikacje dla ochrony zdrowia

Dane epidemiologiczne dotyczące kraniosynostozy mają ważne implikacje dla systemów opieki zdrowotnej:

  • Kraniosynostoza powinna być idealnie leczona w środowisku multidyscyplinarnym46
  • Niemowlęta powinny być badane jak najszybciej po rozpoznaniu, najlepiej w ciągu pierwszych kilku tygodni życia47
  • Optymalna opieka nad niemowlętami z anomaliami czaszkowo-twarzowymi wymaga multidyscyplinarnego podejścia zespołowego48
  • Po potwierdzeniu diagnozy kraniosynostozy, leczeniem jest korekcja chirurgiczna. Najlepszy czas na zabieg chirurgiczny to okres, gdy niemowlę ma od trzech do dziewięciu miesięcy49

Odpowiednie leczenie pacjentów z kraniosynostozą wymaga multidyscyplinarnego zespołu, z dobrze zorganizowanym podejściem opartym na trzech filarach: klinicznych i tomograficznych cechach pacjenta; społecznych i demograficznych aspektach dziecka; oraz technicznej wiedzy i dostępnych zasobach w ośrodku leczącym.50

Dane epidemiologiczne pomagają w planowaniu opieki zdrowotnej i alokacji zasobów, szczególnie w kontekście wzrostu częstości występowania niektórych typów kraniosynostozy. Aktualizacja danych dotyczących częstości występowania ułatwia planowanie opieki zdrowotnej i umożliwia dokładniejsze badania potencjalnych zmian w częstości występowania kraniosynostozy.51

Kolejne rozdziały

Zapraszamy do dalszego czytania naszego leksykonu.

Wybierz kolejny rozdział z menu poniżej, aby otworzyć nową podstronę kompedium wiedzy i uzyskać szczegółowe informację o leku, substancji lub chorobie.

  1. 11.04.2026
  2. www.leksykon.com.pl

Materiały źródłowe

  • #1 Global Epidemiology of Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35636659/
    Craniosynostosis leads to craniofacial deformity and may result in raised intracranial pressure, neurocognitive deficits, and psychosocial issues if left untreated. The global epidemiology of craniosynostosis is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate global birth prevalence. […] The overall birth prevalence of craniosynostosis was 5.9 per 10,000 live births (20 studies; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9, 8.4; I2 = 100%). The birth prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 5.2 per 10,000 live births (9 studies; 95% CI: 3.4, 7.3; I2 = 98%). The number of children born globally with craniosynostosis in 2019 was estimated to be 84,665 (95% CI: 55,965, 120,540), including 72,857 (95% CI: 47,637, 120,280) with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. […] Craniosynostosis is a common condition that affects the neurocognitive and craniofacial skeletal development of children worldwide. Initiatives to scale up capacity for craniosynostosis epidemiologic research and clinical care are warranted, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
  • #2 Craniosynostosis – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544366/
    The prevalence of craniosynostosis is 1 in 2000 to 2500 live births. […] Risk factors include maternal smoking, in utero exposure to teratogens, intrauterine constraint, diabetes, and excessive use of caffeine. Thyroid disease may also predispose to developing craniosynostosis. […] Non-syndromic craniosynostosis occurs in roughly 75% of cases, with the remaining cases observed with syndromic craniosynostosis. […] Craniosynostosis is classified based on the affected sutures: sagittal craniosynostosis occurs in 55% to 60% of the cases, unilateral coronal craniosynostosis in 20% to 25% of cases, metopic craniosynostosis in approximately 15% of cases, and lambdoid craniosynostosis in 3% to 5% of cases. Clinical identification is typically apparent within the first year of life.
  • #3 Craniosynostosis | European Journal of Human Genetics
    https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2010235
    Craniosynostosis, defined as the premature fusion of the cranial sutures, presents many challenges in classification and treatment. At least 20% of cases are caused by specific single gene mutations or chromosome abnormalities. […] The overall prevalence of craniosynostosis has been estimated at between 1 in 2100 and 1 in 2500 births. […] Craniosynostosis is important to recognise and treat because it can be associated with many complications affecting sensory, respiratory and neurological function. […] Craniosynostosis should ideally be managed in a multidisciplinary setting. […] In a recent analysis of a 10-year prospective cohort of craniosynostosis presenting to our unit, a genetic diagnosis was achieved in 21% of cases, comprising 86% single gene disorders and 15% chromosome abnormalities (one patient had both).
  • #4 Global Epidemiology of Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35636659/
    Craniosynostosis leads to craniofacial deformity and may result in raised intracranial pressure, neurocognitive deficits, and psychosocial issues if left untreated. The global epidemiology of craniosynostosis is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate global birth prevalence. […] The overall birth prevalence of craniosynostosis was 5.9 per 10,000 live births (20 studies; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9, 8.4; I2 = 100%). The birth prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 5.2 per 10,000 live births (9 studies; 95% CI: 3.4, 7.3; I2 = 98%). The number of children born globally with craniosynostosis in 2019 was estimated to be 84,665 (95% CI: 55,965, 120,540), including 72,857 (95% CI: 47,637, 120,280) with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. […] Craniosynostosis is a common condition that affects the neurocognitive and craniofacial skeletal development of children worldwide. Initiatives to scale up capacity for craniosynostosis epidemiologic research and clinical care are warranted, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
  • #5 Epidemiology of craniosynostosis in Norway in: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics Volume 26 Issue 1 (2020) Journals
    https://thejns.org/pediatrics/view/journals/j-neurosurg-pediatr/26/1/article-p68.xml
    The authors present population-based epidemiological data for craniosynostosis regarding incidence, age at diagnosis, sex differences, and frequency of syndromic and familial cases. […] The incidence increased significantly during the study period and was 5.5 per 10,000 live births (1/1800) in the last 5-year period. […] Syndromic craniosynostosis accounted for 27% of the cases, and the incidence remained stable throughout the three 5-year periods. […] The incidence of craniosynostosis increased during the study period, and the observed incidence is among the highest reported. […] The study revealed a high number of familial cases in both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics as an underlying cause of craniosynostosis. […] The authors found a high incidence and a high number of familial cases of syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics in craniosynostosis.
  • #6 Incidence of Non-Syndromic and Syndromic Craniosynostosis in Swed…: Ingenta Connect
    https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/wk/scs/2022/00000033/00000005/art00093
    Premature craniosynostosis is a rare condition, with a wide range of incidence estimations in the literature. The aim of this study was to establish the current incidence among the Swedish population. […] Results show an incidence of 7.7 cases per 10,000 live births, including 0.60/10,000 syndromic craniosynostosis. […] Due to information programs among health care staff and a system for early diagnosis through rapid communication, these results seem to mirror the true incidence of craniosynostosis in the Swedish population. The updated incidence data will facilitate healthcare planning and make future studies of possible changes in craniosynostosis incidence more accurate.
  • #7 The incidence of craniosynostosis in the Netherlands, 1997-2007
    https://repub.eur.nl/pub/34587/
    The first aim of this study was to determine the incidence of craniosynostosis, metopic synostosis and sagittal synostosis in the Netherlands from 1997 to 2007. […] The incidence of craniosynostosis increased from 2.6 per 10 000 live births in 1997 to 6.4 in 2007. […] The incidence of metopic synostosis showed a significant increase of 6% each year (p = 0.029). […] We observed a significant change in the proportion of metopic synostosis, with a mean percentage of 20% during 1997-2000 and 27% during 2001-2007 (p = 0.046). […] The incidence of sagittal synostosis annually increased by 3% (p = 0.89). […] Conclusion: The incidence of craniosynostosis, metopic synostosis and sagittal synostosis is 6.4; 1.9; and 2.8 per 10,000 live births, respectively. […] Both the incidence and the proportion of metopic synostosis have significantly increased over the study period, concluding that metopic synostosis is on the rise.
  • #8 Epidemiology of craniosynostosis in Norway in: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics Volume 26 Issue 1 (2020) Journals
    https://thejns.org/pediatrics/view/journals/j-neurosurg-pediatr/26/1/article-p68.xml
    The authors present population-based epidemiological data for craniosynostosis regarding incidence, age at diagnosis, sex differences, and frequency of syndromic and familial cases. […] The incidence increased significantly during the study period and was 5.5 per 10,000 live births (1/1800) in the last 5-year period. […] Syndromic craniosynostosis accounted for 27% of the cases, and the incidence remained stable throughout the three 5-year periods. […] The incidence of craniosynostosis increased during the study period, and the observed incidence is among the highest reported. […] The study revealed a high number of familial cases in both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics as an underlying cause of craniosynostosis. […] The authors found a high incidence and a high number of familial cases of syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics in craniosynostosis.
  • #9 The incidence of craniosynostosis in the Netherlands, 1997-2007
    https://repub.eur.nl/pub/34587/
    The first aim of this study was to determine the incidence of craniosynostosis, metopic synostosis and sagittal synostosis in the Netherlands from 1997 to 2007. […] The incidence of craniosynostosis increased from 2.6 per 10 000 live births in 1997 to 6.4 in 2007. […] The incidence of metopic synostosis showed a significant increase of 6% each year (p = 0.029). […] We observed a significant change in the proportion of metopic synostosis, with a mean percentage of 20% during 1997-2000 and 27% during 2001-2007 (p = 0.046). […] The incidence of sagittal synostosis annually increased by 3% (p = 0.89). […] Conclusion: The incidence of craniosynostosis, metopic synostosis and sagittal synostosis is 6.4; 1.9; and 2.8 per 10,000 live births, respectively. […] Both the incidence and the proportion of metopic synostosis have significantly increased over the study period, concluding that metopic synostosis is on the rise.
  • #10 Craniosynostosis – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544366/
    The prevalence of craniosynostosis is 1 in 2000 to 2500 live births. […] Risk factors include maternal smoking, in utero exposure to teratogens, intrauterine constraint, diabetes, and excessive use of caffeine. Thyroid disease may also predispose to developing craniosynostosis. […] Non-syndromic craniosynostosis occurs in roughly 75% of cases, with the remaining cases observed with syndromic craniosynostosis. […] Craniosynostosis is classified based on the affected sutures: sagittal craniosynostosis occurs in 55% to 60% of the cases, unilateral coronal craniosynostosis in 20% to 25% of cases, metopic craniosynostosis in approximately 15% of cases, and lambdoid craniosynostosis in 3% to 5% of cases. Clinical identification is typically apparent within the first year of life.
  • #11 Pediatric Craniosynostosis: Background, Pathophysiology, Epidemiology
    https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1175957-overview
    Incidence of craniosynostosis is 0.040.1% or 1 in every 2500 babies. […] Of affected individuals, 28% have primary craniosynostosis. The remaining cases are secondary craniosynostosis, which frequently is accompanied by microcephaly. […] The frequencies of the various types of craniosynostosis are as follows: sagittal 5058%, coronal 2029%, metopic 410%, and lambdoid 24%. […] Raised intracranial pressure is rare with fusion of a single suture. It can occur in primary craniosynostosis when multiple sutures fuse. […] Craniosynostosis is equally distributed in both boys and girls. […] Craniosynostosis is evident at birth (neonatal period) when associated with other craniofacial abnormalities. […] Secondary or primary craniosynostosis becomes evident as the child grows (018 mo).
  • #12 The incidence of craniosynostosis in the Netherlands, 1997-2007
    https://repub.eur.nl/pub/34587/
    The first aim of this study was to determine the incidence of craniosynostosis, metopic synostosis and sagittal synostosis in the Netherlands from 1997 to 2007. […] The incidence of craniosynostosis increased from 2.6 per 10 000 live births in 1997 to 6.4 in 2007. […] The incidence of metopic synostosis showed a significant increase of 6% each year (p = 0.029). […] We observed a significant change in the proportion of metopic synostosis, with a mean percentage of 20% during 1997-2000 and 27% during 2001-2007 (p = 0.046). […] The incidence of sagittal synostosis annually increased by 3% (p = 0.89). […] Conclusion: The incidence of craniosynostosis, metopic synostosis and sagittal synostosis is 6.4; 1.9; and 2.8 per 10,000 live births, respectively. […] Both the incidence and the proportion of metopic synostosis have significantly increased over the study period, concluding that metopic synostosis is on the rise.
  • #13
    https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/fulltext/2012/09000/changing_epidemiology_of_nonsyndromic.4.aspx
    Recent studies in Europe and the United States report increased incidence of metopic synostosis. […] This research aimed to determine changes in incidence and subtypes of craniosynostosis in Victoria and to identify perinatal risk factors. […] The prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 3.1 in 10,000 live births in Victoria. On average, the incidence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis increased by 2.5% per year among Victorian live births. Over 25 years, metopic synostosis incidence significantly increased by 7.1% per year in the population of Victoria, outpacing other subtypes. […] This study revealed a true increase in incidence of metopic synostosis in Victoria, which could be a result of increased frequency of multiple births, preterm gestation, low birth weight, and high maternal age in the Victorian population from 1982 to 2008. The incidence of other nonsyndromic craniosynostoses, which include sagittal, unicoronal, and multisutural craniosynostoses, however, has remained unchanged.
  • #14 Craniosynostosis – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544366/
    The prevalence of craniosynostosis is 1 in 2000 to 2500 live births. […] Risk factors include maternal smoking, in utero exposure to teratogens, intrauterine constraint, diabetes, and excessive use of caffeine. Thyroid disease may also predispose to developing craniosynostosis. […] Non-syndromic craniosynostosis occurs in roughly 75% of cases, with the remaining cases observed with syndromic craniosynostosis. […] Craniosynostosis is classified based on the affected sutures: sagittal craniosynostosis occurs in 55% to 60% of the cases, unilateral coronal craniosynostosis in 20% to 25% of cases, metopic craniosynostosis in approximately 15% of cases, and lambdoid craniosynostosis in 3% to 5% of cases. Clinical identification is typically apparent within the first year of life.
  • #15 Craniosynostosis | Concise Medical Knowledge
    https://www.lecturio.com/concepts/craniosynostosis/
    Craniosynostosis is classified as simple or complex, and can be caused by environmental factors or genetic syndromes. […] Prevalence: 1 in 2,000-2,500 live births. […] Risk factors: Environmental: maternal smoking, teratogen exposure, intrauterine constraint, fetal positioning. […] Genetic: Due to mutations in 20% of cases. […] Typically autosomal dominant. […] 50% are new mutations. […] Types: Non-syndromic in 75% of cases, Syndromic in 25% of cases.
  • #16 Epidemiology of craniosynostosis in Norway in: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics Volume 26 Issue 1 (2020) Journals
    https://thejns.org/pediatrics/view/journals/j-neurosurg-pediatr/26/1/article-p68.xml
    The authors present population-based epidemiological data for craniosynostosis regarding incidence, age at diagnosis, sex differences, and frequency of syndromic and familial cases. […] The incidence increased significantly during the study period and was 5.5 per 10,000 live births (1/1800) in the last 5-year period. […] Syndromic craniosynostosis accounted for 27% of the cases, and the incidence remained stable throughout the three 5-year periods. […] The incidence of craniosynostosis increased during the study period, and the observed incidence is among the highest reported. […] The study revealed a high number of familial cases in both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics as an underlying cause of craniosynostosis. […] The authors found a high incidence and a high number of familial cases of syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics in craniosynostosis.
  • #17 Craniosynostosis | European Journal of Human Genetics
    https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2010235
    Craniosynostosis, defined as the premature fusion of the cranial sutures, presents many challenges in classification and treatment. At least 20% of cases are caused by specific single gene mutations or chromosome abnormalities. […] The overall prevalence of craniosynostosis has been estimated at between 1 in 2100 and 1 in 2500 births. […] Craniosynostosis is important to recognise and treat because it can be associated with many complications affecting sensory, respiratory and neurological function. […] Craniosynostosis should ideally be managed in a multidisciplinary setting. […] In a recent analysis of a 10-year prospective cohort of craniosynostosis presenting to our unit, a genetic diagnosis was achieved in 21% of cases, comprising 86% single gene disorders and 15% chromosome abnormalities (one patient had both).
  • #18 Craniosynostosis – Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craniosynostosis
    Craniosynostosis occurs in one in 2000 births. […] It is estimated that craniosynostosis affects 1 in 1,800 to 3,000 live births worldwide. […] Three out of every four cases affect males. […] Sagittal synostosis is the most common phenotype, representing 40% to 55% of nonsyndromic cases, while coronal synostosis represents between 20% and 25% of cases. […] Metopic synostosis is a factor in 5% to 15% of cases, and lambdoid synostosis is seen in 0% to 5% of nonsyndromic cases. […] Five to 15% of the time more than one suture is involved; this is referred to as „complex craniosynostosis” and is typically part of a syndrome.
  • #19 Craniosynostosis | Pocket Dentistry
    https://pocketdentistry.com/craniosynostosis-2/
    Craniosynostosis encompasses fusion of one of these sutures in a sporadic occurrence without any other systemic abnormalities. […] Incidence: 1 in 2,000 (40% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 4:1. […] Incidence: 1 in 2,500 to 15,000 (10-20%; recent studies have shown an increase of metopic synostosis up to 40% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 3:1. […] Incidence: 1 in 10,000 (20% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, female:male of 3:2. […] Incidence: 1 in 10,000 (20% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 1:1. […] Incidence: Rare, less than 3% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 2:1.
  • #20 Craniosynostosis | Pocket Dentistry
    https://pocketdentistry.com/craniosynostosis-2/
    Craniosynostosis encompasses fusion of one of these sutures in a sporadic occurrence without any other systemic abnormalities. […] Incidence: 1 in 2,000 (40% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 4:1. […] Incidence: 1 in 2,500 to 15,000 (10-20%; recent studies have shown an increase of metopic synostosis up to 40% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 3:1. […] Incidence: 1 in 10,000 (20% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, female:male of 3:2. […] Incidence: 1 in 10,000 (20% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 1:1. […] Incidence: Rare, less than 3% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 2:1.
  • #21 Craniosynostosis | Pocket Dentistry
    https://pocketdentistry.com/craniosynostosis-2/
    Craniosynostosis encompasses fusion of one of these sutures in a sporadic occurrence without any other systemic abnormalities. […] Incidence: 1 in 2,000 (40% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 4:1. […] Incidence: 1 in 2,500 to 15,000 (10-20%; recent studies have shown an increase of metopic synostosis up to 40% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 3:1. […] Incidence: 1 in 10,000 (20% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, female:male of 3:2. […] Incidence: 1 in 10,000 (20% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis) Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 1:1. […] Incidence: Rare, less than 3% of all nonsyndromic craniosynostosis Epidemiology: Sporadic, male:female of 2:1.
  • #22 Pediatric Craniosynostosis: Background, Pathophysiology, Epidemiology
    https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1175957-overview
    Incidence of craniosynostosis is 0.040.1% or 1 in every 2500 babies. […] Of affected individuals, 28% have primary craniosynostosis. The remaining cases are secondary craniosynostosis, which frequently is accompanied by microcephaly. […] The frequencies of the various types of craniosynostosis are as follows: sagittal 5058%, coronal 2029%, metopic 410%, and lambdoid 24%. […] Raised intracranial pressure is rare with fusion of a single suture. It can occur in primary craniosynostosis when multiple sutures fuse. […] Craniosynostosis is equally distributed in both boys and girls. […] Craniosynostosis is evident at birth (neonatal period) when associated with other craniofacial abnormalities. […] Secondary or primary craniosynostosis becomes evident as the child grows (018 mo).
  • #23 What’s New
    https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CFH/DGDS/Pages/cbdmp/Craniosynostosis.aspx
    Rates of Craniosynostosis: 20182020 […] Overall […] Rates of Craniosynostosis Prevalence Rate* All Deliveries 5.0 […] By Age […] Mothers Age (Years) Prevalence Rate* 24 and under 2.9 2529 6.0 3034 5.4 3539 4.8 40 and over 5.7 […] By Race and Ethnicity […] Mothers Race and Ethnicity Prevalence Rate* American Indian/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Other/Non-Hispanic 2.6 Asian/Non-Hispanic 2.1 Black/Non-Hispanic 0.7 Hispanic 5.0 White/Non-Hispanic 6.6 […] *Per 10,000 live births […] Data Source: California Birth Defects Monitoring Program Registry, 20182020, California 10-County Catchment Area (Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Orange, San Diego, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tulare)
  • #24 What’s New
    https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CFH/DGDS/Pages/cbdmp/Craniosynostosis.aspx
    Rates of Craniosynostosis: 20182020 […] Overall […] Rates of Craniosynostosis Prevalence Rate* All Deliveries 5.0 […] By Age […] Mothers Age (Years) Prevalence Rate* 24 and under 2.9 2529 6.0 3034 5.4 3539 4.8 40 and over 5.7 […] By Race and Ethnicity […] Mothers Race and Ethnicity Prevalence Rate* American Indian/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, Other/Non-Hispanic 2.6 Asian/Non-Hispanic 2.1 Black/Non-Hispanic 0.7 Hispanic 5.0 White/Non-Hispanic 6.6 […] *Per 10,000 live births […] Data Source: California Birth Defects Monitoring Program Registry, 20182020, California 10-County Catchment Area (Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Orange, San Diego, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tulare)
  • #25 Craniosynostosis by race/ethnicity: Louisiana, 2014-2017 Average | PeriStats | March of Dimes
    https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/data/old?reg=22&top=16&stop=504&lev=1&slev=4&obj=1
    It is important to track birth defects and trends so that research can be done to understand possible causes and methods of prevention. […] The majority of states (44 states and Puerto Rico) have a type of birth defects surveillance system. […] States also report data to the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN), which publishes an annual report. […] During 2014-2017 (average) in Louisiana, 10.7 in 10,000 live births were born with Craniosynostosis.
  • #26 Craniosynostosis by race/ethnicity: Illinois, 2014-2018 Average | PeriStats | March of Dimes
    https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/data/old?reg=17&top=16&stop=504&lev=1&slev=4&obj=1
    It is important to track birth defects and trends so that research can be done to understand possible causes and methods of prevention. […] The majority of states (44 states and Puerto Rico) have a type of birth defects surveillance system. […] States also report data to the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN), which publishes an annual report. […] During 2014-2018 (average) in Illinois, 5.5 in 10,000 live births were born with Craniosynostosis.
  • #27 Craniosynostosis – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544366/
    The prevalence of craniosynostosis is 1 in 2000 to 2500 live births. […] Risk factors include maternal smoking, in utero exposure to teratogens, intrauterine constraint, diabetes, and excessive use of caffeine. Thyroid disease may also predispose to developing craniosynostosis. […] Non-syndromic craniosynostosis occurs in roughly 75% of cases, with the remaining cases observed with syndromic craniosynostosis. […] Craniosynostosis is classified based on the affected sutures: sagittal craniosynostosis occurs in 55% to 60% of the cases, unilateral coronal craniosynostosis in 20% to 25% of cases, metopic craniosynostosis in approximately 15% of cases, and lambdoid craniosynostosis in 3% to 5% of cases. Clinical identification is typically apparent within the first year of life.
  • #28 Craniosynostosis | Concise Medical Knowledge
    https://www.lecturio.com/concepts/craniosynostosis/
    Craniosynostosis is classified as simple or complex, and can be caused by environmental factors or genetic syndromes. […] Prevalence: 1 in 2,000-2,500 live births. […] Risk factors: Environmental: maternal smoking, teratogen exposure, intrauterine constraint, fetal positioning. […] Genetic: Due to mutations in 20% of cases. […] Typically autosomal dominant. […] 50% are new mutations. […] Types: Non-syndromic in 75% of cases, Syndromic in 25% of cases.
  • #29
    https://journals.lww.com/epidem/abstract/1995/05000/parental_occupations_as_risk_factors_for.20.aspx
    In a population-based case-control study, we examined relations between maternal and paternal occupations and the risk of infant craniosynostosis. […] We found no strong associations for maternal occupations. Of paternal occupations, two groups were associated with moderately increased odds ratios after adjustment for maternal smoking and altitude: agriculture and forestry (odds ratio = 2.3; 95% confidence interval = 1.05.2), and mechanics and repairmen (odds ratio = 2.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.26.1). For both, the odds ratios were higher for males.
  • #30
    https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/fulltext/2012/09000/changing_epidemiology_of_nonsyndromic.4.aspx
    Recent studies in Europe and the United States report increased incidence of metopic synostosis. […] This research aimed to determine changes in incidence and subtypes of craniosynostosis in Victoria and to identify perinatal risk factors. […] The prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 3.1 in 10,000 live births in Victoria. On average, the incidence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis increased by 2.5% per year among Victorian live births. Over 25 years, metopic synostosis incidence significantly increased by 7.1% per year in the population of Victoria, outpacing other subtypes. […] This study revealed a true increase in incidence of metopic synostosis in Victoria, which could be a result of increased frequency of multiple births, preterm gestation, low birth weight, and high maternal age in the Victorian population from 1982 to 2008. The incidence of other nonsyndromic craniosynostoses, which include sagittal, unicoronal, and multisutural craniosynostoses, however, has remained unchanged.
  • #31 NCT03025763 | Boston Children’s Hospital
    https://www.childrenshospital.org/clinical-trials/nct03025763
    Craniosynostosis (CS) is a common malformation occurring in ~4 per 10,000 live births in which the sutures between skull bones close too early, causing long-term problems with brain and skull growth. […] The etiology of coronal NSC (cNSC) is not well understood, although the published literature suggests that it is a multifactorial condition. […] About 5-14% of coronal craniosynostosis patients have a positive family history, with a specific genetic etiology identified in ~25% of cNSC cases, suggesting a strong genetic component in the pathogenesis of this birth defect. […] Craniosynostosis and other skull abnormalities are among the most common human malformations usually requiring surgical and medical intervention. […] High quality genomic data will be obtained from patients with coronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (cNSC) and their available parents.
  • #32 NCT03025763 | Boston Children’s Hospital
    https://www.childrenshospital.org/clinical-trials/nct03025763
    Craniosynostosis (CS) is a common malformation occurring in ~4 per 10,000 live births in which the sutures between skull bones close too early, causing long-term problems with brain and skull growth. […] The etiology of coronal NSC (cNSC) is not well understood, although the published literature suggests that it is a multifactorial condition. […] About 5-14% of coronal craniosynostosis patients have a positive family history, with a specific genetic etiology identified in ~25% of cNSC cases, suggesting a strong genetic component in the pathogenesis of this birth defect. […] Craniosynostosis and other skull abnormalities are among the most common human malformations usually requiring surgical and medical intervention. […] High quality genomic data will be obtained from patients with coronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (cNSC) and their available parents.
  • #33 Epidemiology of craniosynostosis in Norway in: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics Volume 26 Issue 1 (2020) Journals
    https://thejns.org/pediatrics/view/journals/j-neurosurg-pediatr/26/1/article-p68.xml
    The authors present population-based epidemiological data for craniosynostosis regarding incidence, age at diagnosis, sex differences, and frequency of syndromic and familial cases. […] The incidence increased significantly during the study period and was 5.5 per 10,000 live births (1/1800) in the last 5-year period. […] Syndromic craniosynostosis accounted for 27% of the cases, and the incidence remained stable throughout the three 5-year periods. […] The incidence of craniosynostosis increased during the study period, and the observed incidence is among the highest reported. […] The study revealed a high number of familial cases in both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics as an underlying cause of craniosynostosis. […] The authors found a high incidence and a high number of familial cases of syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics in craniosynostosis.
  • #34 Epidemiology of craniosynostosis in Norway in: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics Volume 26 Issue 1 (2020) Journals
    https://thejns.org/pediatrics/view/journals/j-neurosurg-pediatr/26/1/article-p68.xml
    The reported incidence of craniosynostosis varies between 1 in 1600 and 1 in 4000 live births, and it seems to be increasing. […] Syndromic craniosynostosis constitutes between 12% and 31% of all cases. […] The epidemiology of craniosynostosis in the literature varies significantly between countries, regions, and medical centers. […] The increase over the three 5-year periods is significant for individuals with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and/or midline synostosis in addition to individuals with rare genetic syndromes. […] The high number of familial cases in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis suggests a genetic cause, in addition to the more established genetic involvement in syndromic craniosynostosis.
  • #35 Craniosynostosis by race/ethnicity: Illinois, 2014-2018 Average | PeriStats | March of Dimes
    https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/data/old?reg=17&top=16&stop=504&lev=1&slev=4&obj=1
    It is important to track birth defects and trends so that research can be done to understand possible causes and methods of prevention. […] The majority of states (44 states and Puerto Rico) have a type of birth defects surveillance system. […] States also report data to the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN), which publishes an annual report. […] During 2014-2018 (average) in Illinois, 5.5 in 10,000 live births were born with Craniosynostosis.
  • #36 Incidence of Non-Syndromic and Syndromic Craniosynostosis in Swed…: Ingenta Connect
    https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/wk/scs/2022/00000033/00000005/art00093
    Premature craniosynostosis is a rare condition, with a wide range of incidence estimations in the literature. The aim of this study was to establish the current incidence among the Swedish population. […] Results show an incidence of 7.7 cases per 10,000 live births, including 0.60/10,000 syndromic craniosynostosis. […] Due to information programs among health care staff and a system for early diagnosis through rapid communication, these results seem to mirror the true incidence of craniosynostosis in the Swedish population. The updated incidence data will facilitate healthcare planning and make future studies of possible changes in craniosynostosis incidence more accurate.
  • #37 Craniosynostosis: A multidisciplinary approach based on medical, social and demographic factors in a developing country | Revista Médica del Hospital General de México
    https://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-revista-medica-del-hospital-general-325-articulo-craniosynostosis-a-multidisciplinary-approach-based-S0185106316300129
    Craniosynostosis is defined as a premature fusion of the cranial sutures, and has an incidence of 1/1750 to 1/2100 live births. […] Incidence of isolated suture craniosynostosis is about 1 in 2000 live births and the gender more frequently affected is the male gender. […] The objectives of the following article are to describe the study and management protocol of patients with craniosynostosis at a public, third level institution, taking into account the social and demographic factors of the patient, in a developing country. […] In Mexico, social, cultural, demographic and economic factors play a determinant role in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Oftentimes, patients are referred rather late (around 1 year of age) for the first evaluation by the craniofacial team. This is partly due to an insufficient medical surveillance and follow-up in patients and families who live in rural areas and small towns, and in families with a poor cultural background.
  • #38 Epidemiology of craniosynostosis in Norway in: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics Volume 26 Issue 1 (2020) Journals
    https://thejns.org/pediatrics/view/journals/j-neurosurg-pediatr/26/1/article-p68.xml
    The authors present population-based epidemiological data for craniosynostosis regarding incidence, age at diagnosis, sex differences, and frequency of syndromic and familial cases. […] The incidence increased significantly during the study period and was 5.5 per 10,000 live births (1/1800) in the last 5-year period. […] Syndromic craniosynostosis accounted for 27% of the cases, and the incidence remained stable throughout the three 5-year periods. […] The incidence of craniosynostosis increased during the study period, and the observed incidence is among the highest reported. […] The study revealed a high number of familial cases in both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics as an underlying cause of craniosynostosis. […] The authors found a high incidence and a high number of familial cases of syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, thus highlighting the importance of genetics in craniosynostosis.
  • #39 The incidence of craniosynostosis in the Netherlands, 1997-2007
    https://repub.eur.nl/pub/34587/
    The first aim of this study was to determine the incidence of craniosynostosis, metopic synostosis and sagittal synostosis in the Netherlands from 1997 to 2007. […] The incidence of craniosynostosis increased from 2.6 per 10 000 live births in 1997 to 6.4 in 2007. […] The incidence of metopic synostosis showed a significant increase of 6% each year (p = 0.029). […] We observed a significant change in the proportion of metopic synostosis, with a mean percentage of 20% during 1997-2000 and 27% during 2001-2007 (p = 0.046). […] The incidence of sagittal synostosis annually increased by 3% (p = 0.89). […] Conclusion: The incidence of craniosynostosis, metopic synostosis and sagittal synostosis is 6.4; 1.9; and 2.8 per 10,000 live births, respectively. […] Both the incidence and the proportion of metopic synostosis have significantly increased over the study period, concluding that metopic synostosis is on the rise.
  • #40
    https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/fulltext/2012/09000/changing_epidemiology_of_nonsyndromic.4.aspx
    Recent studies in Europe and the United States report increased incidence of metopic synostosis. […] This research aimed to determine changes in incidence and subtypes of craniosynostosis in Victoria and to identify perinatal risk factors. […] The prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 3.1 in 10,000 live births in Victoria. On average, the incidence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis increased by 2.5% per year among Victorian live births. Over 25 years, metopic synostosis incidence significantly increased by 7.1% per year in the population of Victoria, outpacing other subtypes. […] This study revealed a true increase in incidence of metopic synostosis in Victoria, which could be a result of increased frequency of multiple births, preterm gestation, low birth weight, and high maternal age in the Victorian population from 1982 to 2008. The incidence of other nonsyndromic craniosynostoses, which include sagittal, unicoronal, and multisutural craniosynostoses, however, has remained unchanged.
  • #41 Epidemiology of craniosynostosis in Norway in: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics Volume 26 Issue 1 (2020) Journals
    https://thejns.org/pediatrics/view/journals/j-neurosurg-pediatr/26/1/article-p68.xml
    The reported incidence of craniosynostosis varies between 1 in 1600 and 1 in 4000 live births, and it seems to be increasing. […] Syndromic craniosynostosis constitutes between 12% and 31% of all cases. […] The epidemiology of craniosynostosis in the literature varies significantly between countries, regions, and medical centers. […] The increase over the three 5-year periods is significant for individuals with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and/or midline synostosis in addition to individuals with rare genetic syndromes. […] The high number of familial cases in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis suggests a genetic cause, in addition to the more established genetic involvement in syndromic craniosynostosis.
  • #42 Global Epidemiology of Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35636659/
    Craniosynostosis leads to craniofacial deformity and may result in raised intracranial pressure, neurocognitive deficits, and psychosocial issues if left untreated. The global epidemiology of craniosynostosis is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate global birth prevalence. […] The overall birth prevalence of craniosynostosis was 5.9 per 10,000 live births (20 studies; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9, 8.4; I2 = 100%). The birth prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 5.2 per 10,000 live births (9 studies; 95% CI: 3.4, 7.3; I2 = 98%). The number of children born globally with craniosynostosis in 2019 was estimated to be 84,665 (95% CI: 55,965, 120,540), including 72,857 (95% CI: 47,637, 120,280) with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. […] Craniosynostosis is a common condition that affects the neurocognitive and craniofacial skeletal development of children worldwide. Initiatives to scale up capacity for craniosynostosis epidemiologic research and clinical care are warranted, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
  • #43 Global Epidemiology of Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – PubMed
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35636659/
    Craniosynostosis leads to craniofacial deformity and may result in raised intracranial pressure, neurocognitive deficits, and psychosocial issues if left untreated. The global epidemiology of craniosynostosis is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate global birth prevalence. […] The overall birth prevalence of craniosynostosis was 5.9 per 10,000 live births (20 studies; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9, 8.4; I2 = 100%). The birth prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 5.2 per 10,000 live births (9 studies; 95% CI: 3.4, 7.3; I2 = 98%). The number of children born globally with craniosynostosis in 2019 was estimated to be 84,665 (95% CI: 55,965, 120,540), including 72,857 (95% CI: 47,637, 120,280) with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. […] Craniosynostosis is a common condition that affects the neurocognitive and craniofacial skeletal development of children worldwide. Initiatives to scale up capacity for craniosynostosis epidemiologic research and clinical care are warranted, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
  • #44 Craniosynostosis-an Epidemiological Study In A Tertiary Care Institute, IJSR – International Journal of Scientific Research(IJSR), IJSR | World Wide Journals
    https://www.worldwidejournals.com/international-journal-of-scientific-research-(IJSR)/article/craniosynostosis-an-epidemiological-study-in-a-tertiary-care-institute/MTU5NTQ=/
    Aim:– To study the epidemiology, common types, treatment and prognosis of craniosynostosis in 12 cases presented in RGGGH, chennai between Aug 2015– Aug 2017. […] 12 cases who were admitted in RGGGH between Aug 2015 and Aug 2017 with the diagnosis of craniosynotosis were studied. Their demographics were documented, followed up and treatment and prognosis recorded. […] Early identification and corrective surgery for craniosynostosis is imperative to prevent potential long term complications and sequlae.
  • #45 Frontiers in Medical Case ReportsMedical Research Online Library-Open Access
    https://www.jmedicalcasereports.org/article_html.php?did=6909&issueno=0
    The craniosynostosis, are complex and broad entities in their approach, which not only hinders their diagnosis but also their management; At present, and as it has been previously referenced, surgical management is not only performed for aesthetic purposes, but also functional, since it is demonstrated that adequate surgical management and at the proper time, decreases the appearance of neurological sequelae secondary to late management of craniosynostosis.
  • #46 Craniosynostosis | European Journal of Human Genetics
    https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2010235
    Craniosynostosis, defined as the premature fusion of the cranial sutures, presents many challenges in classification and treatment. At least 20% of cases are caused by specific single gene mutations or chromosome abnormalities. […] The overall prevalence of craniosynostosis has been estimated at between 1 in 2100 and 1 in 2500 births. […] Craniosynostosis is important to recognise and treat because it can be associated with many complications affecting sensory, respiratory and neurological function. […] Craniosynostosis should ideally be managed in a multidisciplinary setting. […] In a recent analysis of a 10-year prospective cohort of craniosynostosis presenting to our unit, a genetic diagnosis was achieved in 21% of cases, comprising 86% single gene disorders and 15% chromosome abnormalities (one patient had both).
  • #47 Craniosynostosis | AAFP
    https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2004/0615/p2863.html
    Optimal care of infants with craniofacial anomalies requires a multidisciplinary team approach. Infants should be evaluated within the first few weeks of life. However, referral is appropriate at any age. Once the diagnosis of craniosynostosis is confirmed, the treatment is surgical correction. The best time to intervene is when the infant is between three and nine months of age.
  • #48 Craniosynostosis | AAFP
    https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2004/0615/p2863.html
    Optimal care of infants with craniofacial anomalies requires a multidisciplinary team approach. Infants should be evaluated within the first few weeks of life. However, referral is appropriate at any age. Once the diagnosis of craniosynostosis is confirmed, the treatment is surgical correction. The best time to intervene is when the infant is between three and nine months of age.
  • #49 Craniosynostosis | AAFP
    https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2004/0615/p2863.html
    Optimal care of infants with craniofacial anomalies requires a multidisciplinary team approach. Infants should be evaluated within the first few weeks of life. However, referral is appropriate at any age. Once the diagnosis of craniosynostosis is confirmed, the treatment is surgical correction. The best time to intervene is when the infant is between three and nine months of age.
  • #50 Craniosynostosis: A multidisciplinary approach based on medical, social and demographic factors in a developing country | Revista Médica del Hospital General de México
    https://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-revista-medica-del-hospital-general-325-articulo-craniosynostosis-a-multidisciplinary-approach-based-S0185106316300129
    The adequate management of patients with craniosynostosis requires a multidisciplinary team, with a well-organized approach, based on three pillars: the patient’s clinical and tomographic features; the child’s social and demographic aspects; and the technical expertise and available resources at the treating craniofacial center. The already complex treatment protocol can be even more difficult in developing countries due to social and demographic factors.
  • #51 Incidence of Non-Syndromic and Syndromic Craniosynostosis in Swed…: Ingenta Connect
    https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/wk/scs/2022/00000033/00000005/art00093
    Premature craniosynostosis is a rare condition, with a wide range of incidence estimations in the literature. The aim of this study was to establish the current incidence among the Swedish population. […] Results show an incidence of 7.7 cases per 10,000 live births, including 0.60/10,000 syndromic craniosynostosis. […] Due to information programs among health care staff and a system for early diagnosis through rapid communication, these results seem to mirror the true incidence of craniosynostosis in the Swedish population. The updated incidence data will facilitate healthcare planning and make future studies of possible changes in craniosynostosis incidence more accurate.